ROCKFORD, Ill. (WLS) – Eight migrant buses were in route to Chicago Sunday morning after a plane from Texas carrying over 300 asylum seekers landed in Rockford overnight.

The migrants were flown from Texas to Illinois in a jumbo jet, landing at Rockford International Airport, Rockford ABC affiliate WTVO reported.

The migrant crisis Chicago has been grappling with has once again made its way to the suburbs.

After the plane landed, the passengers were reportedly immediately put on buses heading to Chicago’s landing zone near West Polk Street and South Desplaines Street.

The City of Chicago issued a statement Sunday afternoon, saying that city officials had been notified by Rockford of the plane’s arrival. Eight buses from Rockford have dropped off migrants in multiple suburbs on the way to Chicago, but they have not yet reached Chicago, city officials said.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    149 months ago

    You know this is going to back fire on Texas, states might require permits or taxes to travel to and from a state.

    • bluGill
      link
      fedilink
      279 months ago

      They can’t. several supreme court cases already give aeright to travel. Immigration belongs to the federal government

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        169 months ago

        Somebody should explain that to all the Texas towns trying to ban traveling out of state for an abortion.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        09 months ago

        Just put toll booths in at the border to Illinois from all directions. It’s almost impossible to travel across the u.s. without going through Illinois or going way out of your way to avoid it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’ve been all over the US and pretty sure I’ve never been in or through Illinois with exception to flights. I think you’re greatly overestimating the size of Illinois and underestimating available options of US driving travel.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -59 months ago

            If you want to go around you’ll have to drive through Kentucky or through the Michigan UP Mackinaw bridge or through Canada. There’s a lot of freight that goes through Illinois as well as coming in/going out from ORD.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              19 months ago

              Tons of freight moves along i40 as well. It never approaches Illinois. You might be familiar with the traversal lanes up there, but there are several main thoroughfares south of there. 40, 20 and 10 all have tons of e/w traffic. All are south of Illinois. It’s not that hard to avoid one medium sized state.

    • SeaJ
      link
      fedilink
      09 months ago

      That would be pretty unconstitutional.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        09 months ago

        bans travel to other states for an abortion

        having busses travel from other states is unconstitutional

        Pick a lane

        • SeaJ
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          Banning travel to other states for an abortion is also very clearly unconstitutional. There are still pretty big differences between restricting travel from specific states for something that is completely legal (driving a bus) and restricting your citizens from going outside your state to do something that is illegal in your state (abortion). One is a matter of jurisdiction while the other is a matter of travel restriction.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -29 months ago

      I’m not sure whether that would be a feasible solution. The undocumented part of “undocumented immgrant” is a result of immigrants bypassing a similar system when entering the country.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        “Hey let’s find a solution to our broken immigration system”

        Texas: “nope send dem to dem LiBeRaLs”

        “Wow Texas youre so smart, you’re totally not trafficking people like the cartels”

        They should just secede and become a desert version of North korea.

        Edit:corrected

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        99 months ago

        You know this is going to back fire on Texas, states might require permits or taxes to travel to and from a state.

        I’m just waiting for the /s

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          69 months ago

          Ha-ha.

          As I understand it, this is a suggestion that it would be okay for states to take blatantly unconstitutional action in retribution for the likely criminal acts of the Texas state government. I’m hoping that I’m wrong, because that’s nuts.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              29 months ago

              Consequences… why does that word seem so strange now?

              We are most certainly like-minded in that regard.

              If unconstitutional action is something that Democrats and Republicans see as necessary, authoritarianism has won, and everyone/everything else has lost.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                09 months ago

                Meh, it’s a comment from an anonymous rando on the Internet. I’m a lot more concerned with the fact that the state of Texas is in the human trafficking business than OP’s comment.