@[email protected] to No Stupid [email protected] • 6 months agoWhy do we have an internal monologue?message-square135fedilinkarrow-up1225file-text
arrow-up1213message-squareWhy do we have an internal monologue?@[email protected] to No Stupid [email protected] • 6 months agomessage-square135fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink23•edit-26 months agoIn the article they bring up many questionable aspects of this idea, which also seems to lack in scientific support. And so the bicameral mind remains a highly controversial idea
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish13•6 months agoAbsolutely. I’m no expert, and since there weren’t any studies performed on people from that era, I’d expect it to be taken as a theory rather than a fact.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•6 months agoPedantry, not conversation. Still, you are correct.
In the article they bring up many questionable aspects of this idea, which also seems to lack in scientific support.
Absolutely. I’m no expert, and since there weren’t any studies performed on people from that era, I’d expect it to be taken as a theory rather than a fact.
Hypothesis not Theory
Pedantry, not conversation.
Still, you are correct.