What are you using as a Google photos alternative? Currently I’m using Nextcloud but I’m thinking of switching to a more dedicated solution.

I mainly need to upload photos from my device automatically, have an UI to see and classify them, albuns and sharing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Yep, until PhotoPrism revealed themselves to be the greedy cunts they are.

    I sponsor my favourite tech projects annually, as I believe in supporting independent and responsible open-source development.

    I became a paid Github sponsor for PhotoPrism because they promised features like multi-user were coming, and they indicated that paid sponsors would get access. After what seemed way too long a wait, they finally released the features many of us had been waiting for, only to stick them behind a monthly paid subscription. For self-hosted users. 🤨

    So, I switched to Immich about 6 months ago. I’ve found Alex and the rest of the team to be very active, and quite responsive to support requests, including on Discord. Additionally, the development is fast-paced and new features are coming all the time.

    My money’s going to Immich. PhotoPrism can go get fucked.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      only to stick them behind a monthly paid subscription. For self-hosted users.

      holy shit

    • azron
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -5
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The user feature is available for non paying users too. If you want a gui for managing that is now behind plus. I don’t see exactly how wantng to make a living off of your work makes you a greedy cunt especially when it seems the features trickle down as they should. Am I missing something?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1511 months ago

        It’s about expectation setting. You can’t say “paid donators will get X” then say “actually you won’t, give us more money for X”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1211 months ago

          Also, there’s usually no reason as a user to pay monthly for a feature in a self-hosted application.
          The Dev has no monthly costs for that feature. Let me buy the application/feature, and if you need money for a new feature, create a feature that is worth buying again. No need to bully the user into a monthly subscription…

        • azron
          link
          fedilink
          English
          411 months ago

          I missed that bait and switch. Thank you for the response.