• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    We had a kid cross state lines to show up to a riot with a gun to defend property and shoot people. Just because you haven’t heard about it doesn’t mean it’s not plausible as a valid reason.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 months ago

      And? Do you think he heard about it from a police radio, and not literally every news outlet that was covering it at the time?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        You must know that unencrypted police radios have been a upstream source for local media for a long time, right?

        And I’m not arguing that encryption is a good idea, in fact I think a blanket encryption of emergency radio is a bad idea (but nuance on social media is invisible).

        This thread is simply in answer to an earlier poster who asked for a situation where it could be helpful to protect a sensitive situation and I provided one that we have seen analogs of in real life.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          Sure, they get some information from radios. They also usually have at least one person at the headquarters at all times. They will know about big events regardless.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            I forgot that police have no filters or power in person to be more private in discussions about sensitive topics just because there’s a person at their precinct. All conversations happen wide open just like you get with a police-band scanner. 🤦🏻‍♂️

    • ripcord
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      Plausible, but is it likely? Enough to be even remotely worth it…?