• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We really need more browser engines floating around.

    As of now we really only have 3, Webkit, Firefox Gecko, and Chromium Blink.

    Everything is based on these 3. And I know, technically chromium and firefox are both based on webkit, but they’re so far gone from webkit they function as their own engines.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I doubt that’s what they meant since Safari currently uses WebKit. But yeah, maybe they meant how WebKit is a fork of KHTML and Chrome is a fork of WebKit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Ultimately you really only have KHTML (what Webkit was forked from), Gecko, Triton (IE classic), and I can’t recall what the new (now dead) engine in IE11 was called. The rest are forks, mostly of Webkit/KHTML.

        I guess there’s Ladybird and Servo too, but they are a way still from being used as a daily driver.

    • kib48
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      tbh i think it would be better if there was a single collaborative engine instead, owned by a non-profit company like The Linux Foundation

      maybe the W3C could establish their own but idk if they even do anything these days

        • @BoastfulDaedra
          link
          English
          61 year ago

          In this case I still feel like that’s an improvement.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          321 year ago

          Not going to lie, I really hate when the internet gets a new favorite phrase. Destroys discussion on the subjects and feels like it’s a race for commenters to say the hit phrase.

          • R0cket_M00se
            link
            fedilink
            English
            121 year ago

            Lemmy is chock full of stupid people on the right team for the wrong reasons. They treat switching to Linux and FF the same way someone would declare they gave their life to Jesus Christ.

            Most of them can’t even explain why something is good or bad without resorting to the catch phrase of the day. “Enshittification”, “EEE”, “Chrome bad cuz capitalism or something, gib updoots.”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -121 year ago

            If what you were gonna say is quashed by people knowing the big corpo tricks and treachery, then chances are what you had to say served no interests but corpo interest to begin with.

            • R0cket_M00se
              link
              fedilink
              English
              131 year ago

              Username checks out.

              Maybe we’re just tired of sheep. Even sheep that happened to end up on the right side.

              • @BoastfulDaedra
                link
                English
                5
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                At least he’s honest. Props for that.

                I mean he’s dead wrong, but the user name is refreshing.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -71 year ago

                You’re doing an awful lot of Baaaa-ing over there to cry about other people being sheep.

        • phillaholic
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          It’s not. In the late 90s it was pretty much just IE after Netscape died. Mozilla came from the ashes.

          • R0cket_M00se
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Literally. It was originally built on the Netscape engine before making Gecko and transitioning to that.

        • kib48
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          extinguishing Chromium is the goal, isn’t it?