• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    821 year ago

    If you mean a small tax per share when purchased then that would be a great idea. Make high frequency trading, that contributes zero to society, unprofitable. It wouldn’t hurt household investors as the tax would be small but it would hurt the assholes who manipulate prices through trading back and forth.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      High frequency trading is fully automated insider trading done in broad daylight, but nothing gets done about it because most people don’t understand what it is. It shouldn’t be taxed; it should be illegal.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        It’s a long and convoluted route from that to their 401ks not bring as plump as they could be. Indirect robbery of thousands is more palatable than being mugged for a few dollars.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I wish I remembered the name of it but there was a really interesting documentary/video about how crazy the rapid trading got, to the point that companies were trying to install systems as close as physically possible to the physical location of the NASDAQ so their requests would have less “travel” time and show up before anyone else.

        Absolute insanity…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Yeah. Didn’t the feds have to regulate that so that it was an equal playing field for transaction latency?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        We’re not asking for 5 minute intervals. Just 1-2 second intervals would stop that automated stuff, or at least diminish it significantly. How about setting it to how long it takes light to go around the world twice +1 second?