• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Because it was a running gun fight. The Army also released it’s After Action report showing there was in fact RPGs there. Now I’m not saying the reporters were bad guys, but they clearly embedded with an anti coalition militia. That carries the same risk of getting killed as embedding with coalition forces.

    • HACKthePRISONS
      link
      fedilink
      -211 months ago

      you’re saying embedded journalists are civillians, but the us doesn’t try to avoid killing them? seems like you owe the other commenter an apology.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        Of course we try to avoid killing them. But there’s no way that Apache crew can discern them from the militia they embedded in. They’re not super human.

        • HACKthePRISONS
          link
          fedilink
          -211 months ago

          if they wanted to avoid killing them, they could just not-pull the trigger. but tehy didn’t try not to kill them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            211 months ago

            Again. There was no way to discern them from the militia. The Army is not going to just let themselves get shot at because there “might be” a reporter on the other side.

            • HACKthePRISONS
              link
              fedilink
              011 months ago

              seems to me they had the option to stay away from that conflict entirely, but the commander in chief decided that it was ok to endanger civillians with his adventurism. staying the fuck home wuold have meant that they avoided killing civillians. they chose not to do that.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                211 months ago

                I agree. That would have prevented civilian deaths at the hands of Americans. Soldiers don’t have that choice though. They do the best they can with the situation at hand.