• capital
    link
    fedilink
    English
    810 months ago

    No, who’s saying they believe Meta’s intentions are pure?

    • Schadrach
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -310 months ago

      Prole believes those are the same thing.

      Meta doesn’t get any real data from federating Threads that they can’t get right now by just running a web scraper over it. Most of the dire worries presented are either not something they could actually do (like forcing ads on other instances), are things individual users could just block the instance to avoid, or are things that could be resolved by just defederating them later if they seem to be going down that road.

      The biggest realistic threat is probably an Eternal September 2.0 scenario, but that is going to happen if and when Lemmy becomes popular.

      • capital
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I was going to say I knew all that and was poking to make it clear to others that literally no one is saying that but then you hit me with “Eternal September 2.0 scenario” haha.

        I’ll have to do a little searching on that one.

        Edit: Ah, I had forgotten.

          • @[email protected]B
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 months ago

            Here’s the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

            Eternal September or the September that never ended is Usenet slang for a period beginning around 1993 when Internet service providers began offering Usenet access to many new users. The flood of new users overwhelmed the existing culture for online forums and the ability to enforce existing norms. AOL followed with their Usenet gateway service in March 1994, leading to a constant stream of new users. Hence, from the early Usenet point of view, the influx of new users in September 1993 never ended.

            to opt out, pm me ‘optout’. article | about