@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 10 months agoYou know how bad it needs to be to be ignored for over 2 decades!lemmy.dbzer0.commessage-square102fedilinkarrow-up1884
arrow-up1879imageYou know how bad it needs to be to be ignored for over 2 decades!lemmy.dbzer0.com@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 10 months agomessage-square102fedilink
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)linkfedilinkEnglish4•10 months agoNo, no, it can only be 1997, logically. The Y2038 problem.
Y2K
No, no, it can only be 1997, logically.
The Y2038 problem.
There are no years before 2000.