• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 months ago

    Yeah, aside from the factual inaccuracies and the axe-grinding so obvious that it may as well be classified as an op-ed, it’s so smugly sanctimonious.

    • ivanafterall
      link
      fedilink
      611 months ago

      “67% of people prefer self-checkout, but based on no data, that’s probably changing, because we think it should and probably a lot of people are upset about the stealing that isn’t really happening!”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 months ago

        Don’t forget the part about how “67% of people prefer this thing, but all companies are quitting that thing because of a lie they cooked up to convince people to accept price gouging.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        The only people upset about the “stealing” are the companies that let it happen.

        Said this the other day - 30 years ago I worked retail, our security would detain you in a secure office with cameras, and let the police handle you.

        Every security shift had at least one cop working security as a second job, or were retired cops.

        These companies stopped detaining shoplifters because their insurance gave them a deal not to. Well, then they don’t get to complain about theft.

        Self-checkout likely has little bearing, since the systems use scales, have an attendant watching, and use cameras on your face and the checkout itself.

        I smell a lot of bullshit. There’s no way the vendors of these systems didn’t address all this stuff before deploying them - otherwise they could be held contractually liable for failures. No way vendor security leadership, nor the grocery chain security leadership let these systems go out without addressing these concerns.