@[email protected] to Math [email protected]English • 1 year ago95.121% accuracyi.imgur.commessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up181cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up181image95.121% accuracyi.imgur.com@[email protected] to Math [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoActually it would approach 100% without ignoring data wouldn’t it?
minus-squareCevilia (she/they/…)linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoBut the only way it would actually get there depends on you, and your willingness to ignore data. :)
Actually it would approach 100% without ignoring data wouldn’t it?
But the only way it would actually get there depends on you, and your willingness to ignore data. :)