• cum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -16
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It’s kind of you to worry about the aesthetics of your child’s penis, which studies have shown that it improves body image and sexual satisfaction anyways. You should really leave the medical suggestions to the professionals. There’s so much anti-science in this thread going on, I’d assume that I was in a crazy 5G anti vax conspiracy bullshit forum. What is it about medical scientific evidence that makes people so upset? All I’m doing is repeating and sharing established medical studies after all, but apparently that makes people a little emotional. Kind of like vaccinations!

    • AWildMimicAppears
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2810 months ago

      this is NOT about aesthetics. this is about robbing a child of a deeply personal choice.

      • cum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1410 months ago

        Suppose we should just not name children until they’re old enough to choose their own name too. We’re talking about some fuckin skin on the tip of the dick lol. Most will never even know the difference until they go see it in a health class or Google what the differences even look like.

        What are the pros and cons here again? The cons of the situation is that they might end up wanting some extra skin at the tip of the dick for whatever reason. The pros is health and self confidence improvement. The pros outweigh the cons here, it’s a no brainer. It’s a simple medical procedure has been factually proven to improve health and self confidence, and it’s by far the safest to perform on a new born.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          25
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          This is the most idiotic thing I’ve ever read. They can change their name if they want to. How old they have to be is different from country to country.

          Equating naming a child with cutting off stuff from their bodies is fucking stupid.

        • AWildMimicAppears
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1910 months ago

          like @[email protected] said: names can be changed. and if your confidence is based on a mutilated sexual organ, then go cut yourself as much as you like, but leave others alone. don’t do something irreversible to someone without their consent.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2210 months ago

      Multilating childrens genitals for appearance is pretty fucked up.

      That choice should be left to themselves and no one else. Unless absolutely necessary of course.

      The supposed benefits are very very small and the majority of the world is doing absolutely fine without removing the foreskin of children.

      • cum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1110 months ago

        Maybe go back and read all the text you ignored about the other benefits. Would love to see you link any established peer-reviewed studies that can back up your neanderthal level reading comprehension.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1410 months ago

          I don’t give a fuck about those “benefits” which have miniscule impact and can absolutely be achieved by means other than cutting a baby’s foreskin.

          Adults can cut their dick off if they want, surely a lot of men would do it if those benefits are so impressive.

          Parents should not have the freedom to mutilate their babies because they say so. Only if a doctor recommends it because of an actual disease (phimosis or whatever).

          That is basic ethics. Don’t make unneeded permanent choices for a baby. If it is a decision that can easily wait until the baby is an adult, it is evil to make it for them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1810 months ago

      Honest question, did you read this study before you posted it? The sample size is 37 Turkish men who voluntarily applied for circumcision. Do you not find that sample to be extremely small? Don’t you think there would be some inherent bias when assessing the psychological effect in people who had chosen to undergo the procedure? If anything, this study reinforces that circumcision should be left to the individual to choose, rather than having the procedure done against their will as an infant.