• ferret
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3010 months ago

    A trillion of an SI prefix will always be silly. Just use a bigger prefix!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        810 months ago

        Most of us aren’t used to “terrawatts” though. Is that like one Earth worth of watts? One watt as measured on Earth? The definition of watt culturally accepted by Earthlings?

        • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          You wouldn’t find a terawatt in everyday usage, but a terawatt-hour is pretty commonplace when talking about the energy usage of entire populations.

          This Reuters article states US power demand will climb to “4,027 billion kWh in 2022.” Yeah, just say 4 PWh. Or even 4,027 TWh. It’s a little more easily digested.

          It’s already an incomprehensably high number. No matter which way you state it is going to fly over peoples heads.

          And the entire electricity consumption of the planet is something like 25.5 petawatt-houts.

          • QuinceDaPence
            link
            fedilink
            410 months ago

            They say it like that because people are used to being billed in kWh so it gives them a reference.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            210 months ago

            I think theperson you’re replying to was making a joke off the misspelling of “terrawatts” in OP.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            Oh that’s super interesting and I did not know that, but I was riffing off the double R in “terrawatt,” instead of “terawatt.”

            Like “tera” describes an order of magnitude, but “terra” means “earth,” as in “terra firma,” “terra nova,” or “terran.”

            So I guess you could say that 25.5 petawatt-hours = 25,500 terawatt-hours = 1 terrawatt-hour.