Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

    • @[email protected]English
      2•10 months ago

      Machines aren’t culpable in law.

      There is more than one human involved in creating and operating the machine.

      The debate is, which humans are culpable?

      The programmers, trainers, or prompters?

        • @[email protected]English
          1•10 months ago

          If you try to bread with an autonomous knife and the knife kills you by stabbing you in the head. Is it solely your fault?

            • @[email protected]English
              1•10 months ago

              So you’re saying if it’s easy to accidentally get copyright images out of this AI by prompting ordinary worlds. Then the AI designers have some questions to answer.

                • @[email protected]English
                  1•10 months ago

                  “The Joker” is a generic description of a character. Going back to medieval courts.

                  If the result is a copyrighted version of that character that’s not the promoters fault.

                  That’s the fault of the ones who compile the training data.