GenAI tools ‘could not exist’ if firms are made to pay copyright | Computer Weekly
www.computerweekly.com
Artificial intelligence firm Anthropic hits out at copyright lawsuit filed by music publishing corporations, claiming the content ingested into its models falls under ‘fair use’ and that any licensing regime created to manage its use of copyrighted material in training data would be too complex and costly to work in practice

GenAI tools ‘could not exist’ if firms are made to pay copyright::undefined

  • JackGreenEarthEnglish
    9•5 months ago

    I see way too many people advocating for copyright. I understand in this case it benefits big companies rather than consumers, but if you disagree with copyright, as I do, you should be consistent.

    • OptionalEnglish
      10•5 months ago

      Copyright law should benefit humans, not machines, not corporations. And no, corporations are not people. Anthony Kennedy can get bent.

      • JackGreenEarthEnglish
        6•5 months ago

        I hate the MAGMA companies as much as anyone, but AI such as LLMs, especially the open source stuff Facebook and Stable diffusion is making, is beneficial to us all.

      • @[email protected]English
        5•5 months ago

        Abolishing copyright in the way that allows for the existence of Gen AI benefits people far more than it does corpos

    • @[email protected]English
      7•5 months ago

      You don’t have to be against copyright, as such. Fair Use is part of copyright law. It exists to prevent copyrights from being abused against the interests of the general public.

      • JackGreenEarthEnglish
        4•5 months ago

        But I am against any copyright beyond forcing attribution to the original creator.