• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2610 months ago

    Nope. You’re, as usual, 100% wrong.

    You’re ascribing intent that is not at all evident in the video.

    It’s a video of a silly person doing something more silly than most real people ever would, in order to promote how virtuous she is, which isn’t helping anyone. That’s all it is. That’s the caricature.

    There’s no part of it that suggests that all mention of racism is virtue signaling. That’s YOUR thought. Whether or not you agree with it, that originated with YOU, not the video.

      • TigrisMorte
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        Which is why I objected to declaring all anti-racist behavior by whites as virtue signaling? you’ve got some amazing alternative logic going on there.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      210 months ago

      Whilst I do agree that The Onion often takes something and runs with it to create an extreme situation hoping to bump into humour…

      …they’re still making choices about what aspects to run with. They could have just as easily taken a Ben Shapiro type conservative and made them run away with being I don’t know, so unpolitically correct that they become politically correct again. I don’t know, that’s just off the top of my head, but the point is they are choosing who they mock.

      …and they used to choose more substantial issues.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1010 months ago

        They could have just as easily taken a Ben Shapiro type conservative

        Nope, you can’t take something that’s already exaggerated past the point of self-parody and then parody it.

        they’re still making choices about what aspects to run with.

        Which in this case is unhelpful virtue signaling taking attention away from honest anti-racism that’s actually about helping people.

        • Cosmic Cleric
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Nope, you can’t take something that’s already exaggerated past the point of self-parody and then parody it.

          Why?

          And what exactly is past self-parody? What comes after that? (Besides ‘plaid’.)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            Because you can’t exaggerate something to make it ridiculous when it’s already so ridiculous.

            Bad faith communicators like him already take their outrageous rhetoric and false conclusions farther than any funny parody would, effectively making them impossible to humorously satirize.

            • TigrisMorte
              link
              fedilink
              110 months ago

              Please do tell us more about how racism is solved and not an issue anyone would genuinely think needs to be addressed.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                110 months ago

                I never claimed any such thing, nor would I ever. Do you ever say anything that’s NOT about a ridiculous strawman you concocted in your mostly empty head?

          • TigrisMorte
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            And note the “already exaggerated past the point of self-parody” their entire point is in fact exactly that anti-racists are nothing but self aggrandizing attention seekers.

    • TigrisMorte
      link
      fedilink
      210 months ago

      So you admit that it is a caricature intended to mock anti-racist activists as nothing but virtue singling attention seekers, but think it is nothing more despite that being exactly what theater has used it for for the entirety of the Human existence. cool, cool.