[email protected] to [email protected] • 10 months agoAnon goes apesh.itjust.worksmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1380
arrow-up1380imageAnon goes apesh.itjust.works[email protected] to [email protected] • 10 months agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink43•edit-210 months agoNo because this is classical operant conditioning not Pavlovian. Edit: Corrected for my stupid response while exhausted.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink25•10 months agoPavlovian conditioning IS classical conditioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink14•10 months agoI think its like every pavlovian is a classical but not every classical is a pavlovian.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•10 months agoThis is what happens when I’m posting while exhausted. It’s not Pavlovian/classical, it’s operant conditioning.
No because this is
classicaloperant conditioning not Pavlovian.Edit: Corrected for my stupid response while exhausted.
Pavlovian conditioning IS classical conditioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning
I think its like every pavlovian is a classical but not every classical is a pavlovian.
This is what happens when I’m posting while exhausted. It’s not Pavlovian/classical, it’s operant conditioning.