@[email protected]M to Comic [email protected] • 1 year agoClimate Summitlemmy.worldmessage-square121fedilinkarrow-up11.64Kcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11.64KimageClimate Summitlemmy.world@[email protected]M to Comic [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square121fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink20•1 year agoIt’s equivalent to “for no reason” not to “for no cost”
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 year agoBut the man in the comic assumes there is no issue at play.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 year agoSo, you don’t believe those things are worth the cost, absent the threat of climate change?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoI do but that’s not the conversation we’re having.
It’s equivalent to “for no reason” not to “for no cost”
The reason would be to not cost so much…
It would cost far more to not address the issue.
But the man in the comic assumes there is no issue at play.
Exactly.
No, it’s making fun of that assumption.
So, you don’t believe those things are worth the cost, absent the threat of climate change?
I do but that’s not the conversation we’re having.
What conversation are we having?
deleted by creator