As the title states really. I need to refer to this diverse group of people, who somehow have gotten put in the same box labeled “sexual minorites”.

I’m a boring CISHET vanilla white male, so I don’t really know. I want to include as many as I can when I refer to “lgbtq+ people”. I’ve been studying various flags, trying to find the one flag I need. But I can’t really figure it out.

Is lgbtq+ the preferred term, or what should I use? Is a flag better? I don’t want to hurt someone by not including them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1911 months ago

    aromantics and asexuals

    They’re covered by the term “queer” too because they’re not heterosexual. And if anyone identifies as “agender” they’d be covered by the Q too, since they’re not cisgender.

    I’m angry, I sorta want a fight

    I don’t think we have anything to fight about lol

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      511 months ago

      I’m not looking to fight anyone here. I’m sorry if I came across way. I want to stop my boomer coworkers from hurting LGTBQ people in our organization, and if that resolves in me debating my coworkers then that’s a fight I’m not gonna back down from… #imactuallynotverybadassjustextremelytired

      • Izzgo
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        I want to stop my boomer coworkers from hurting LGTBQ people

        As a 70 year old lesbian, I’d like to suggest you might find some more allies in your organization, please don’t assume all boomers are bigots. I have many grey haired allies. I doubt you’re as alone as you think you are, but maybe you’re just more “out” than they are. Give them the chance to come out and join you.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          Last time I did was today, but that was in a teasing funny setting, and to a person I hold a great deal of respect for.

          I wouldn’t in a discussion, I hate name calling, it’s counter productive. But in my mind…

          • macrocarpa
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            But it exists in your head, right? Like you have mentally categorised an age of people as boomers, and you’re associating a behaviour with that category?

            The reason I say is that age is also a protected category…

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Hmm I guess you’re right… I hadn’t thought of it that way before.

              I think I describe the behavior more than the age group, but I still see what you’re saying. Thanks for call me out on it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        Oooh I see what you meant now lol. But yeah, I feel you.

        What’s funny is that a lot of my coworkers would shit-talk trans people until they learned I was transitioning. Now all of the sudden they’re more nuanced and understanding 🤔

    • Lycist
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I don’t want to fight either!

      Speaking as an aromantic though, I am very heterosexual. I just don’t enjoy all the lovey dovey squishy romantic things… Holding hands is mostly ok, anything beyond that kinda grosses me out. (Kissing is so weird…) I very much enjoy most of the more intimate physical things though.

      Many aromantics enjoy physical relationships, but don’t understand the more romantic aspects of them.