• petrescatraian
    link
    fedilink
    310 months ago

    @Fizz yep, absolutely. Only with an analog camera you can catch the image exactly as it is. Others are just tweaked to be displayed as real as possible.

    @leo

    • admiralteal
      link
      fedilink
      24
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Analog cameras also do not catch an image exactly as-is. Most likely, the idea of a “true” image of exactly how a thing exists in the real world is just a fantasy. This is qualia. An image is definitionally subjective. Just look at the history of film technology and the racial biases it helped perserve.

      But there’s undeniably a huge difference between how you interpret and commit the photons going through the lens versus entirely inventing photons going through the lens.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        Very neat article, glad you shared it!

        Interesting to think about now, they mention how modern digital cameras are not great at taking photos of interracial couples. I’m sure / hope someone is working on that, or at least maybe that’s a use case for some of the fancy photo post-processing - to take two photos with different exposure levels and somehow combine them to get accurate features from multiple people of various complexions in one photo.

        • vaalla
          link
          fedilink
          410 months ago

          Already exist, it’s called hdr and almost all modern camera supports them. But they take more time.