• Melllvar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    184
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The Verge reported that CEO Sundar Pichai defended the layoffs and claimed that workers sometimes reach out to express gratitude for the cuts. “And I just want to clarify that, through these changes, people feel it on the ground and sometimes people write back and say, ‘Thank you for simplifying.’ Sometimes we have a complicated, duplicative structure,” he said, per the Verge.

    Chalmers: People send thank you’s for lay offs?

    Pichai: Yes.

    Chalmers: May I see one?

    Pichai: No.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5611 months ago
      1. Who writes an email directly to the CEO of their company, and
      2. Who would that email have to be from for the CEO to actually bother reading it?

      I’m guessing it’s not your rank-and-file type “people”.

      • Natanael
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2311 months ago

        Managers from unaffected departments who are glad they have less internal competition. And that’s pretty much it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1111 months ago

        Certainly only certain people have email addresses that can even send to his inbox. Everyone else would be blocked.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2111 months ago

      Yeah that whole line smells like pure bullshit. I’ve never seen anyone be grateful for having their coworkers laid off.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1711 months ago

        We had a coworker that got fired a while back, man that was a relief for the entire department. That person was absolutely toxic to work with, or even near.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          511 months ago

          That is different than for layoffs, which generally is less about rooting out toxic people and more about lowering costs. And people know it usually.

          That said, anyone causing trouble for management or viewed as not pulling their weight will be the first on the list since management won’t have to justify firing them.

        • lad
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          That’s true, but if you had some 5–10% of co-workers so toxic that everyone was relieved to have them fired, things do look grim for your company in terms of morale

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          Fired and laid off are different. The people who were laid off weren’t let go because they were a drag on their teams or their departments, but because theoretically the company didn’t have enough work for them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        I can imagine it, but just a few really awful people. Google, like any company, will have some extreme right-wingers working for it. And, working for Google tends to go with big egos. I can imagine some dude looking at his stock options thinking “yes, all those useless people were holding down the value of my options, now that they’re gone I’m going to be rich”.

    • Lad
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 months ago

      No mother it’s just the simplification