• Sentient Loom
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3310 months ago

        Oh I love the last line. “An idiot could operate it, and indeed many do.”

        Bloodlust seeks any acceptable target. Be suspicious of your own instinct for violence. Fascists also think their violence is righteous.

          • Sentient Loom
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1510 months ago

            There’s a broad range of responses between murder and tolerance. Your bloodlust makes you the same as the people you’re so horny to mutilate.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              510 months ago

              Oh, weird, I initially read the comment you’re replying to as agreeing with your position. Like: ‘we can’t allow our side to hate, or casually joke about killing, those who disagree politically with us’ But after reading your reply I can see it being meant either of two opposite ways.

          • Ann Archy
            link
            fedilink
            410 months ago

            You’re right. We should be tolerant of hateful, sadistic, bigoted, violent pricks and never stand up for what is right.

        • Ann Archy
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          When someone fucks you over in a $500 drug deal, that’s the monetary cutoff point where violence is straight up recommended as far as I am concerned.

          • Sentient Loom
            link
            fedilink
            English
            49 months ago

            A. What does that have to do with fascism?

            B. Alfred Hitchcock did not say this

            • Ann Archy
              link
              fedilink
              39 months ago

              A. There is a point where violence is justified.

              B. Taking an image out of context and adding your take on it is called a meme.

    • Ann Archy
      link
      fedilink
      810 months ago

      What do you mean “nope”? I’m pretty sure bullets stopped the fascists in WW2. Is this a point of contention with you?

      • Sentient Loom
        link
        fedilink
        English
        89 months ago

        Alfred Hitchcock did not say this.

        And OP is just fantasizing about fascism as an excuse to fantasize about violence. Tough Mother fucker on the internet.

        • Ann Archy
          link
          fedilink
          79 months ago
          1. Stephen Crowder didn’t say all those things that memers on the Internet wrote on his sign either

          2. Who says we are fantasizing?

          • Sentient Loom
            link
            fedilink
            English
            49 months ago
            1. Stephen Crowder can get fucked
            2. Your violent fantasies can also get fucked
            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              I think some people are just looking for an excuse to do things they’ve been craving for a long time.

              Let us not dehumanize the people we disagree with and call for violence. Because at that point we are no different than they are.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                39 months ago

                Bullshit. Fascism sees violence not as a means to an end, but a goal unto itself. It will be violent regardless. In contrast, even the most bloodthirsty anti-fascist sees violence as a means to an end; something to be left behind as soon as its purpose is complete.

                If you want to stop it without violence, it has to be now. Once rooted in, a violent response is the only one that will work. Pretending otherwise will only enable them.