Ukrainians are killed, Palestinians die

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      65 months ago

      That’s cope though… as they are not going to get nearly enough votes to win, those candidates are irrelevant. It’s stupid but that is how it is. A vote for them is functionally speaking the same as not voting. Like yeah sure you’ll have “sent a message”, but it’s still a virtual vote for the winner. And you don’t get to complain about him: you could have helped by voting for the other one.

      It sucks that you have to choose the lesser of only two evils (assuming your vote even counts, because lol electoral college) but that is the American way.

          • HACKthePRISONS
            link
            fedilink
            15 months ago

            > no one is going to care about what you think down the road when you’re complaining about a problem you did nothing to stop.

            i do a lot more than vote, but voting against genocide isn’t doing “nothing” to stop it.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  4
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  You’ve made it quite a point to speak so much about something you know so little about. It’s no wonder people laugh at you as much as they do. I sincerely hope you have alt accounts that are less embarrassing than this one.

      • HACKthePRISONS
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        >you’ll have “sent a message”

        the only message sent by a vote is “this is who I want to win”. if you want the genocide enablers to win, you can vote for them. if you want the law and order candidates to win, vote for them.

      • HACKthePRISONS
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        a vote for them is not functionally the same as not-voting. it counts for them. suggesting it doesn’t is just more election misinformation.