• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    What I find particularly interesting is that the Confederacy only existed for 4 years, meaning to run around with an Obama flag would more historically relevant than this shit.

    “Historically relevant” or “historically significant” is really tricky thing to judge sometimes. While Obama’s 2 terms as president meant he was in charge for 8 years vs the Confederacy’s 4, I believe the Confederacy and the US Civil War they caused was more historically relevant than Obama’s 8 years as president.

    There’s a whole lot of nasty from the war and immediate fall out we’re seeing feeling today.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      one could argue that the prelude to the civil war started before independence, since the Quakers were anti-slavery. even disregarding that, fighting was occuring over slavery for decades prior to the formation of the Confederacy - the famous bit at the tail end of that, “bleeding Kansas”, occured in the early 1850s.

      a mere 4 or 8 year length of time is largely inconsequential.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        one could argue that the prelude to the civil war started before independence, since the Quakers were anti-slavery. even disregarding that, fighting was occuring over slavery for decades prior to the formation of the Confederacy - the famous bit at the tail end of that, “bleeding Kansas”, occured in the early 1850s.

        a mere 4 or 8 year length of time is largely inconsequential.

        The US Civil War is more significant than just the penultimate legal question on slavery. It also set the tone for politics for the next 50 years, completely destroyed the population and economy of nearly half the country, and paved the road for some of the most important Amendments to the US Constitution.

        Plus the advances in war time technologies, tactics, and medicine weren’t too shabby.