that analogy doesn’t work. your first statement was “is” your second was “should”. this is an interesting example of an is/ought confusion.
if one had said “the president does not commit crimes! never met him btw” the response would be a lot more reasonable, wouldn’t it?
of course anyone xan make ought statements about anything. you didnt. you said it wasnt fun as if it were a fact. disclaiming your ignorance is fine but not really an excuse. but hey, I dont know anything about you, yet I think you’re a turd swallowing ninny monger!!
Is it fun to make sweeping statements on the internet about things you have no first hand experience with? Yes, yes it is.
That’s why I said I wasn’t a pornstar.
that analogy doesn’t work. your first statement was “is” your second was “should”. this is an interesting example of an is/ought confusion.
if one had said “the president does not commit crimes! never met him btw” the response would be a lot more reasonable, wouldn’t it?
of course anyone xan make ought statements about anything. you didnt. you said it wasnt fun as if it were a fact. disclaiming your ignorance is fine but not really an excuse. but hey, I dont know anything about you, yet I think you’re a turd swallowing ninny monger!!
How would you know?