StrikerM to Lemmy [email protected] • 9 months agoTipping culture npcslemmy.worldmessage-square620fedilinkarrow-up11.25K
arrow-up11.25KimageTipping culture npcslemmy.worldStrikerM to Lemmy [email protected] • 9 months agomessage-square620fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink162•9 months agoAmericans be like; “If you can’t afford to pay 69% tip then don’t go out eating at all”
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink105•9 months agoIf you’re going to say “69%” , you need to call it eating out, not out eating.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•9 months agoIt’s only eating out if it’s 69%, otherwise it’s just sparkling oral.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink30•9 months agoAlso, complaining that things will cost too much if waiters eek by on more than minimum wage.
minus-squareDa Bald Eagullinkfedilink36•9 months agoThe cost is literally the same… Restaurants would just be upfront about it then.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•9 months agoThat would be upsetting to the business owners, though. You know - the Job Creators.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•9 months agoIf I’m directly responsible for their salary, then they’re working for me. I created that job.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•edit-29 months agoYou assume the restaurant’s prices are connected to wages in any meaningful way. We’re paying the wages. That’s all food cost and profit.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink18•9 months agoI gotta say, complaining about being on the verge of a recession while going out for a $70 meal really puts my poverty into perspective.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•9 months agoIf all I had to do was 69 my waiter, I’d be eating out a lot more
Americans be like; “If you can’t afford to pay 69% tip then don’t go out eating at all”
If you’re going to say “69%” , you need to call it eating out, not out eating.
It’s only eating out if it’s 69%, otherwise it’s just sparkling oral.
While getting fucked! What a meal!
Also, complaining that things will cost too much if waiters eek by on more than minimum wage.
The cost is literally the same… Restaurants would just be upfront about it then.
That would be upsetting to the business owners, though. You know - the Job Creators.
If I’m directly responsible for their salary, then they’re working for me. I created that job.
You assume the restaurant’s prices are connected to wages in any meaningful way. We’re paying the wages. That’s all food cost and profit.
Eek! They eke out a living on so little!
I gotta say, complaining about being on the verge of a recession while going out for a $70 meal really puts my poverty into perspective.
If all I had to do was 69 my waiter, I’d be eating out a lot more