• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    39 months ago

    Most people were not very accepting of “different” people back then, but maybe it was just not talked about. There were a ton of “confirmed bachelors” and plenty of women had “roommates”.

    People in the North and South were not different. The North had a ton of racists who didn’t want to fight and die for “colored people”. There was a huge riot in NYC of people who didn’t want to be drafted. They killed black people they found for no reason.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      139 months ago

      I think the Union’s stake in the civil war was more about federal supremacy over the United States (which obviously goes without question in a federal system). Ending slavery was just a function of that goal. I say this as someone who grew up in the southwest and is wholly committed to the authority of the federal government over individual states because that is obviously the system outlined in the constitution.

      Of course “The North” was just as racist and still is just as shitty and racist as every other part of this country.

      P.S. “The South” can suck it as a name, I propose a better title for former confederate states: The Losers (since it seems a certain demographic therein needs reminding).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Sure, the North wanted consolidation. Of course the only reason the south seceded was because the federation said no more slaves

        Many of the people in the North were as racist as the South, but the government was less so

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      A huge part of that riot was the Irish who were fresh off the boat from the potato famine and we’re not pleased that they had escaped one hell and we’re going to be drafted to a war they didn’t care about.