• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    737 months ago

    Not sure why everyone’s cheering, more competition is never bad and there are already plenty of manufacturers adding subscriptions and such, I doubt Apple would even have been the worst.

    At the very least, they probably would’ve had a slick UI in a world of crap infotainment UIs.

    However they announced Carplay 2 a few years ago and I’m hoping manufacturers will go ahead with adding that as an option so you could just opt in to Apple UI all over the car and revert back at any time. This is probably the best of both worlds. There are plenty of companies that know quite well how to build a car, they just mostly still all suck at UI.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      567 months ago

      A problem with apple…Like if my friend has a Toyota, i can borrow that. If they have an icar, I probably couldn’t drive it because I don’t have an iPhone required to start it or apple shoes required to activate the pedals. You know they’d be dicks like that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        377 months ago

        Warning: unauthorized, non apple certified tyres detected on your iCar. Disabling airbags due to security issue.

        Setting destination to Apple Genius bar.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      417 months ago

      Competition usually isn’t bad. Unfortunately, Apple has a tendency to not only be terribly anti-consumer, but also tends to be a trendsetter. They do shitty things, and other companies learn from their example. Thus, the competition becomes a race to the bottom.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Apple can’t compete in that space. Their schtick is producing moderately inexpensive nice looking goods for exorbitant prices that are designed to be impossible to repair by anybody with them.

      Tesla has already corned the market.

      Trying to block people from repairing? check, trying to block sales of used items? check. Getting rid of all the buttons for all the interfaces and making you work with a tablet in the center of the car? Check.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      337 months ago

      Apple isn’t competition, Apple is a closed market, more anticompetitive than Microsoft and only undone by the degree of their control.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Don’t worry, I don’t. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … …

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 months ago

              Monopolies are not a yes or no thing. Since Apple has a large enough market share that it is able to strangle competitors just through having that kind of market share, it is having a monopolistic effect on various markets.

              For example, the smartphone market, if the smartphone market was perfectly competitive, if I didn’t like Apple’s and Google’s business, I would be able to go to a third seller and get similar products. If I didn’t like them, I could go to a fourth, and so on until it becomes meaningless. Like the market for actual apples for example.

              Since that is not true, Apple is distorting the smartphone market with its large market share, making it have monopolistic tendencies.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          … And? Apple isn’t even the dominant anything manufacturer, at least worldwide.

          I don’t know why people are so upset. You’ve already got your closed market, overpriced, social “mine is bigger than yours (but not really)” compensation brand in the EV market. It’s called a Tesla.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The fear for me was that Apple would grow quickly in the EV space due to its mainstream popularity, and then start doing the ecosystem thing so driving anything but an Apple car makes you a second-class citizen. Obviously it would only support Carplay and not Android Auto, and probably lack any sort of non-Carplay connectivity so you just can’t connect your Android phone to it at all. Presumably it would also have a proprietary charger that doesn’t work with other cars or vice versa.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      they probably would’ve had a slick UI

      Apple hasn’t had a slick UI since Apple II PC.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        To clarify, I meant not just the UI itself being pretty, but also reaction speeds. IOS is still smoother than any Android distro I’ve touched and macOS, while sometimes lacking in the UI department, does nearly everything better than Windows. It doesn’t do many things better than my Gentoo install with KDE Plasma, but that’s hardly something for the common user who doesn’t need all the customization and wants a smooth system straight out of the box.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 months ago

          I mainly meant that each time touching anything Apple I prepare myself for something as bad as Windows and it is somehow even more problematic to use.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 months ago

      I was kind of hoping that Apple and Tesla would just feud with each other for control of the “economy-quality product marketed as a luxury-quality product” market share.