“we’ve waited too long to open the aperture on the solution sets in terms of what we need, as a society, to start reducing emissions,” Woods told Fortune

Archived copies of the article: ghostarchive.org web.archive.org archive.today

  • Bizzle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    239 months ago

    Is it playing devil’s advocate to say that criticism should at least be true?

      • Bizzle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        169 months ago

        Awh I’ve never been called a class traitor or a corporate boot licker before 😂 good to know that we’re willing to throw the truth under the bus, I always thought that being better than our enemies was the way but I see now that petty things like the truth are the real enemy. Thank you for opening my eyes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          89 months ago

          Pay no attention to that troll, friend. I’m all for makeing CEOs/billionaires accountable. But what you did was good, and you don’t need to explain yourself to a troll.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            89 months ago

            Just shut the fuck up. That’s not even the point. OP was simply clarifying what the article said, without outside editorializing.

            I am in favor of making CEOs accountable, but all you’re doing is staining the cause with an irrelevant conversation. Wait… is that your goal? Are you a fucking Russian disinformation agent or something?

            Go back to reddit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        139 months ago

        What the fuck, what kind of bullshit is this? This is not how a sane discourse works. This is the worst case of ad-hominem/strawman I’ve seen in a while.

        “Yes, OP, you’re right that the CEO didn’t say that. But do we need the truth prevailing here? He’s a CEO!!! Why are you defending him?!”

        What a load of bullshit.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              You don’t do that for the poster. You do that for other readers.

              When someone makes a completely stupid comment, like “Drink bleach to kill viruses,” I won’t go and reply “no you wrong!” I’ll reply “For anyone reading, that’s a dangerous advice and here’s why [citations].” I don’t care if the poster then replies with “nuh uh, fake nooz.”

              (I didn’t downvote you, by the way.)