• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    249 months ago

    I don’t think it is inherently unethical to work for a defense supplier, but it obviously depends on the country it is supplying. We in the West certainly need a strong defense industry. China and Russia both have publicly declared their intention to conquer other countries. Just ask Ukraine or Taiwan. Or Europe. Europe can’t properly support Ukraine because its defense industry is so fragmented, politicized and atrophied.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      We in the West certainly need a strong defense industry. China and Russia both have publicly declared their intention to conquer other countries. Just ask Ukraine or Taiwan.

      But just don’t ask Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Iraq, Lybia, Panama, Afghanistan, Palestine, Lebanon, Yemen… am I right?

      • lurch (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        99 months ago

        No, do ask them. Go ahead. Some will try to outright murder you for unrelated reasons. Some do not regard the US as a threat any more and the rest will turn out to be goddam assholes you’d wish to be bombed again.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          10
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Ah yes, America killing literally tens of million: righteous! China killing literally no one, absolute scum of the earth!

          Never takes much for the shoe to drop with you people.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            69 months ago

            When did America kill tens of millions? China certainly did kill tens of millions under Mao. Did you make a mistake and reverse the order?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              89 months ago

              You can’t possibly be serious. You’ve got to be a troll.

              Vietnam: 3~4,000,000 (not account for the the devastatinf effects of agent orange) Cambodia: 500,000 (not counting US involvement in continuing Khmer Rouge’s massacres) Laos: 50,000 (not accounting for the still ongoing issue of unexploded ordinances) Korea: 2~4,000,000 Iraq desert storm: 1,000,000+ Iraq/Afghanistan/Syria: 400,00 direct violent deaths and 3~4,000,000 indirect deaths.

              Shall I continue?

                • Hjalmar
                  link
                  fedilink
                  49 months ago

                  He has never claimed that China hasn’t murdered anyone? Neither has he opposed your claim that China killed millions (which they sure did).

                  It’s really sad to see this type of reactions when people try to say anything against the US. Questioning the US is not the same thing as supporting china, whatever US politicians want you to believe.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    5
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    What? You clearly didn’t read the thread. This was his comment:

                    “China killing literally no one, absolute scum of the earth!”

                    Edit: Also, I didn’t try to excuse US killing. I just can’t believe that anyone would claim that China has killed literally no one and then set that up against a claim that the US has killed tens of millions.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  You’re conflating policy failures (for which he absolutely took responsibility) to wars of aggression. If you can’t see how these two aren’t the same you can’t be helped.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        79 months ago

        Korea seems like a really bad example for you, since the South relies on the US to prevent invasion.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I wonder who was leading South Korea for like forty years after the war? There’s no way it would a fascist dictator was it? Yes, no peace treaty was ever signed. What is your point exactly? Why do you think the north has somehow less of a claim than a country that had to be propped up by the world’s biggest bully for decades?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            39 months ago

            Come on, more even the north admits they don’t want unification, just that South Korea is their number one enemy.

            As for the dictator, yes the was bad and dark times. But nowadays SK definitely doesn’t want to get taken over by NK.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              29 months ago

              Yeah, since literally this year. Nearly sixty years on.

              As for the dictator, yes the was bad and dark times.

              The US didn’t seem to.see that as a problem.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      149 months ago

      We in the West certainly need a strong defense industry.

      But our defense industry sells arms to more or less anyone willing to pay. Most types of arms have basically become commodities, and the net effect of anyone producing more is that arms become cheaper and more accessible worldwide.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        99 months ago

        I’m no expert on arms control, but I’m pretty sure the industry in the West can only sell to approved countries. But, yes, I take your point that there is always some form of arms race happening in the world and keeping the arms industry going means having to sell more arms, which will be used to kill people at some point. Unfortunately, we still need a defense industry.