Reddit is ending Reddit Gold and users are furious::undefined

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    I like to think there’s a distinct difference, summed up like so:

    Communism attempts to put the control and distribution of resources (capital) on the collective, ie everyone. Since everyone effectively owns it, it feels like nobody does.

    Capitalism puts it on individuals. Nowadays, almost all of these individuals acquired their resource(s) by inheritance. If not, by dubious (morally questionable) means.

    This is a simplification that may upset people on both sides, but it’s about as clean as I can think to make it.

    Note: the following is from the perspective of a somewhat average person living in the US.

    My personal thought is that the democratic republic political system would ideally be coupled with the communistic (I’d prefer federated unions, ie federations, but speaking broadly) economic one. They seem to be natural matches.

    However, it seems the coupling of said republic with capitalism causes significant and repeated backslides on social issues and education. Capital owners, after all, are most interested in maximizing gains while minimizing losses; this has led to a fairly high number of people being convinced to think that education is bad, especially university level education. Which, in turn, makes them compliant voters and eager workers, often severely underpaid. Which they, of course, have no idea of knowing since they likely have never left their birth town.

    That’s not to say that such things won’t happen with communism. They should happen a lot less, but only if we put controls in place to combat abuse and overreach. In other words, regulations. Capitalism…might be beyond hope at this point, given how capital owners have been acting lately.

    I don’t know what will actually end up working, but I hope we try something new soon. Because this ain’t it. Preferably before we extinct more species. Hopefully before we extinct ourselves.

    I keep ranting, sorry for the wall of text.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      And socialism is the middle ground that apparently no one with the power to implement it wants.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I do hope we see more of this bridging the gap with socialism, but you’re right. To current capital owners, a new system will mean the end of being capital owners. Since they’re defined entirely by their money/capital, to them it’s a legitimate existential threat. Or so it feels like, it seems, given how they’ve been acting.

        But fingers crossed for a more sane future. Hopefully.

    • Morose mammal
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I don’t know what will actually end up working, but I hope we try something new soon.

      Personally I don’t think there is a one-size-fits-all solution. Each problem needs a different approach. We need to figure out how to have all these systems work in tandem.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Hey, I’m open to trying anything. The current biggest problem is oligarchs and power centralization though, which capitalism sort of encourages.

        Without much heavier regulation, sticking with capitalism will essentially doom us all. We need more localized, equal resource management. We need logical transportation logistics, and we need more nationalized (federal) goods and services.

        But I do agree with the spirit of your message. We do need to all be working together towards a shared goal, instead of…this.