@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoSupreme Court restores Trump to ballot, rejecting state attempts to ban him over Capitol attackapnews.commessage-square304fedilinkarrow-up1560cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1560external-linkSupreme Court restores Trump to ballot, rejecting state attempts to ban him over Capitol attackapnews.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square304fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•1 year agoSo states do have the right to set requirements to be on their ballot for a federal election in their state?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoYes, as long as the requirements are uniform in every state and don’t discriminate against any particular candidate. SCOTUS affirmed that last part today.
minus-squareDem BosainlinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoThey’re not uniform. That’s the whole point of my post.
So states do have the right to set requirements to be on their ballot for a federal election in their state?
Yes, as long as the requirements are uniform in every state and don’t discriminate against any particular candidate. SCOTUS affirmed that last part today.
They’re not uniform. That’s the whole point of my post.