@[email protected] to Unpopular [email protected] • 10 months agoYou can't claim to be an environmentalist and be anti-nuclear energy at the same timemessage-square168fedilinkarrow-up1173
arrow-up1173message-squareYou can't claim to be an environmentalist and be anti-nuclear energy at the same time@[email protected] to Unpopular [email protected] • 10 months agomessage-square168fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•10 months agoThor you get from the dollar store (Kyle Hill) disagrees, and demonstrated how harmless the waste is.
minus-squareNakedmolelinkfedilink1•edit-210 months agoThe guy is obviously an advertiser/influencer working for the nuclear industry, which makes his opinion on the topic irrelevant.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•10 months ago“Obvously…” /s Or, when you run the numbers yourself, you realize that it’s about as dangerous as offshore wind turbines are to birds and fish. Which is to say, not very, but a lot of extremely dumb people still parrot it.
minus-squareNakedmolelinkfedilink1•edit-210 months agoStop pretending. It is obvious that the guy is a pro nuclear advertiser. Anyone can see that in a 5 minute google search.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•10 months agoWhatever you say, bud. It’s not worth the time or crayons to debate you further on this.
Thor you get from the dollar store (Kyle Hill) disagrees, and demonstrated how harmless the waste is.
The guy is obviously an advertiser/influencer working for the nuclear industry, which makes his opinion on the topic irrelevant.
“Obvously…” /s
Or, when you run the numbers yourself, you realize that it’s about as dangerous as offshore wind turbines are to birds and fish. Which is to say, not very, but a lot of extremely dumb people still parrot it.
Stop pretending. It is obvious that the guy is a pro nuclear advertiser. Anyone can see that in a 5 minute google search.
Whatever you say, bud. It’s not worth the time or crayons to debate you further on this.
That is also how I feel about you :)