• Sybil
    link
    fedilink
    14 months ago

    Way to ignore the entire point of the person you responded to.

    i’m not ignoring it. i’m challenging it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      94 months ago

      Sorry, I wasn’t aware that you were “challenging it” by ignoring the actual point and making up something else to respond to. My mistake, I’ll have to learn alternative definitions for words.

      • Sybil
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        Sorry, I wasn’t aware that you were “challenging it” by ignoring the actual poin

        the actual point is that they claimed there is a russian campaign to help trump’s performance in november on the basis of biden’s support for genocide. there is no evidence for this.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          74 months ago

          Just like there was no evidence during the 2016 or 2020 campaigns, but surely they’ve changed this election. If only there were any evidence of it happening this round, I’m sure you’d change your mind.

          I mean, could you imagine if they had tried to drum up charges against the president’s family by getting an asset to be believed as a credible witness in a case against his family? Or if they were putting out deep fakes to make people think Biden said something he never did?

          • Sybil
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            could you imagine if they had tried to drum up charges against the president’s family by getting an asset to be believed as a credible witness in a case against his family? Or if they were putting out deep fakes to make people think Biden said something he never did?

            that’s not the claim that’s being made or to which i’m objecting. i’m objecting to the characterization of leftists as russian propagandists.

          • Sybil
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            Just like there was no evidence during the 2016 or 2020 campaigns, but surely they’ve changed this election

            this is innuendo. there is a specific claim being made about people who are objecting to joe’s genocide, and that claim simply isn’t supported by any evidence. your innuendo is slander.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              64 months ago

              Thanks for proving you’re a bad faith actor, you clearly didn’t even bother to read even a single link I posted that showed evidence.

              Bye friend, I’m not dealing with your goalpost moving bs any longer

              • Sybil
                link
                fedilink
                14 months ago

                Thanks for proving you’re a bad faith actor

                your links were provided above. your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith

              • Sybil
                link
                fedilink
                14 months ago

                your goalpost moving

                my position hasn’t changed at all.