Microsoft, doing it’s part to make the world a better place.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2910 months ago

    I suggest Mint for new users (and lazy old users like me). All of the simplicity of Ubuntu, without Canonical’s shit

    • Admiral Patrick
      link
      fedilink
      English
      810 months ago

      I almost went back to Mint on my last rebuild, but ended up going with Debian + Cinnamon. So far so good.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 months ago

      What about Arch? I was told:

      mint is garbage. The only thing easier about mint or any of those “noob friendly” distros is the initial install

      any time you want to do anything outside of its strict little ecosystem it becomes a massive headache

      arch’s wiki is unparalleled

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Mint is for people who generally don’t want to do weird shit, which is most new users. If you do, it’s not any harder than doing it on Ubuntu or Debian.

        If you want in-depth tinkering, go with Arch. If you want newer packages than a Debian base but not necessarily much tinkering, go with Tumbleweed. You’re just going to have to learn a different package manager for each.

        I personally am most comfortable in an environment that has apt, and I don’t change much on my systems, so Mint is nice. My servers are straight Debian

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        710 months ago

        Sounds like neckbeard bullshit honestly, Mint is just fine. Arch is “better” if you like tinkering

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      Ubuntu without snaps or nagging about Ubuntu Pro. I was annoyed with both so I switched over from Ubuntu Mate to Linux Mate and have been enjoying it.