nuff said

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2921 year ago

    Remember the 50% number is just what he was comfortable with publishing to the public

    We have no reason to believe his public statistics

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1651 year ago

      100% of the ads I see on Twitter today are dropshipping scams, while in the pre-musk era they were highly targeted to my job and interests to the point that if there wasn’t the “ad” tag I couldn’t distinguish that.

      They can’t cost the same for the advertiser, a generic dropshipping scam that targets everyone must be cheap

      • enbie bies
        link
        fedilink
        English
        431 year ago

        Targeted ads are more expensive. They need to develop an algorithm for it and the advertiser gets possible higher turnover since it’s no longer random people.

        • BrooklynMan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          plus, twitter could track the impressions and conversion rates, so they could charge even more for that, too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      381 year ago

      Why would he tweet about his losses in the first place? I applaud his openness (/s) but I doubt any investors or advertisers will come running to a dying social networking.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        181 year ago

        I think it’s either better than 50, or he expects it to be better shortly so when he says it’s 40, he can celebrate how good he did for the +10.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        If your losses are at 80% and you tell everyone they’re at 50% you can try to spin the story in your favor.