qaz to Mildly [email protected]English • 4 months agoThe document specifying the usage of ISO8601 doesn't use ISO8601lemmy.worldmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1209
arrow-up1209imageThe document specifying the usage of ISO8601 doesn't use ISO8601lemmy.worldqaz to Mildly [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-square@anemoia_onelinkEnglish6•4 months agoJust chiming in to say fuck ISO, all my homies use rfc (In this case rfc 3339)
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•edit-24 months agoISO uses a weird separator ‘T’ between the time and the date. eg. 2018-04-01T15:20:15.000-0700 RFC3339 can have a space instead which is a bit more readable: eg. 2020-12-09 16:09:53+00:00
minus-square@anemoia_onelinkEnglish7•4 months agoThey aren’t open standards like rfc, you have to pay to access them: https://www.iso.org/store.html It’s similar to the UN in membership, and in my opinion the member states should pay to allow the standards to be open
Just chiming in to say fuck ISO, all my homies use rfc
(In this case rfc 3339)
what’s wrong with ISO?
ISO uses a weird separator ‘T’ between the time and the date. eg. 2018-04-01T15:20:15.000-0700
RFC3339 can have a space instead which is a bit more readable: eg. 2020-12-09 16:09:53+00:00
They aren’t open standards like rfc, you have to pay to access them:
https://www.iso.org/store.html
It’s similar to the UN in membership, and in my opinion the member states should pay to allow the standards to be open