James Lankford cites a veteran as partial reason for recommitting to Sunshine Protection Act, which has already passed in Senate

Archived version: https://archive.ph/QhlaG

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    638 months ago

    I don’t care whether they remove it or make it permanent so long as they just fucking pick one and stick to it.

    • Keith
      link
      fedilink
      68 months ago

      I want them to keep it alternating and nt stick to it.

      Daylight savings time saves 366 lives a year from traffic accidents alone Coate and Markowitz which while isn’t that much is still worth the inconvenience.

      Also,  2015 paper from the Brookings Institute claims a 7% drop in crime, when they extended by 4 weeks, we saved 60 million dollars. If we account for indirect costs like those of murder, rape, we get 246 million saved (Popular Mechanics)

      Basically more light is good

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        568 months ago

        “transition periods in daylight saving time regulations are linked to a rise in total mortality and should be avoided in the interest of general well-being.”

        - National Library of Medicine

        https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7084938/

         

        “Spring DST transition acutely increases fatal traffic accident risk by 6% in the US”

        - A Chronobiological Evaluation of the Acute Effects of Daylight Saving Time on Traffic Accident Risk

        https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(19)31678-1?

         

        “sleep disruptions during the Spring transition cause suicide rates to rise by 6.25 percent and all DoD to increase by 6.59 percent.”

        - Saving Light, Losing Lives: How Daylight Saving Time Impacts Deaths of Despair

        https://www.gc.cuny.edu/sites/default/files/2021-07/Saving-Light%2C-Losing-Lives-How-Daylight-Saving.pdf

         

        So, there’s data supporting DST costing lives, saving lives, and not having any impact either way. I cherry-picked a few to illustrate the former, which paired with yours make for a more complete picture.

        Overall, estimates on the lives lost side appear to be numerically higher; so taking ALL of it at face value, getting rid of DST would save more lives.

        I’d vote to chop it if saving lives is your chief concern.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        498 months ago

        Basically more light is good

        Cutting a foot of fabric off the top of a blanket and sewing it onto the bottom doesn’t result in more blanket.

      • Natanael
        link
        fedilink
        208 months ago

        Permanent standard time is better for health, and the switch also kills people every spring and fall