@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 4 months agoThe DMA already having an impact. Brave Browser installs surge after introduction of browser choice splash screen on iOS.lemmy.worldmessage-square263fedilinkarrow-up11.15Kfile-text
arrow-up11.15KimageThe DMA already having an impact. Brave Browser installs surge after introduction of browser choice splash screen on iOS.lemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square263fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish21•4 months agoNo it doesn’t. It’s meant to illustrate a change and it does so perfectly fine. It’s not a scientific paper. It’s a 32-34% increase looking at the graph. That’s significant enough to shout about. Imagine any change you could make surprising competition by 25% in any market. That’s huge.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish44•4 months ago It’s meant to illustrate a change and it does so perfectly fine Define “perfectly fine”. It is clearly exaggerating the change. At a glance it looks more like a 5 times increase, not a 30% increase.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•4 months agoOf lies, damned lies, and statistics this graph is certainly one of them.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish17•4 months agoDid you know that disco record sales were up 400% for the year ending 1976, if these trends continue…AY!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish13•edit-24 months ago It’s a 32-34% increase looking at the graph But you don’t get that percentage from looking at the graph. You get that from looking at the numbers. The graph height increases by 300% in the last 3 months 9 days.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoYou could say the same about a 0.001 difference if you zoom in on the y-axis. You don’t know what you’re talking about.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoA 0.001 difference on a 0.004 total would be worth showing.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoThat was a bad example. Try 1,000,000 moving up to 1,000,069.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-24 months agoI’m sticking with relevance. A >25% rise is what we’re talking about.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•4 months agoA 25% raise would show up with the y shits at zero. As would any significant increase.
No it doesn’t.
It’s meant to illustrate a change and it does so perfectly fine. It’s not a scientific paper.
It’s a 32-34% increase looking at the graph. That’s significant enough to shout about.
Imagine any change you could make surprising competition by 25% in any market. That’s huge.
Define “perfectly fine”. It is clearly exaggerating the change. At a glance it looks more like a 5 times increase, not a 30% increase.
Of lies, damned lies, and statistics this graph is certainly one of them.
Did you know that disco record sales were up 400% for the year ending 1976, if these trends continue…AY!
But you don’t get that percentage from looking at the graph. You get that from looking at the numbers.
The graph height increases by 300% in the last
3 months9 days.True.
You could say the same about a 0.001 difference if you zoom in on the y-axis. You don’t know what you’re talking about.
A 0.001 difference on a 0.004 total would be worth showing.
That was a bad example. Try 1,000,000 moving up to 1,000,069.
I’m sticking with relevance. A >25% rise is what we’re talking about.
A 25% raise would show up with the y shits at zero. As would any significant increase.