• QubaXR
    link
    fedilink
    English
    661 year ago

    Love the idea, but just to be the devil’s advocate, I think it will just mask garbage videos. Currently, the clickbait thumbnails and titles are an indicator to blacklist a channel, without having to waste time watching it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      551 year ago

      Unfortunately because of the way Youtube’s algorithm works, even high quality channels are buried if they don’t play the game.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Got any examples? I don’t recall any actually quality and worthwhile channels that still use those dumb thumbnails.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Veritasium, he even has a video crunching the numbers as an explanation why he has to doit

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Do you have a link to the video? I casually skimmed through his video list for the past year or so, but none of the titles jumped out at me for this.

              Could also be a good example of why this extension sounds cool haha

              Edit: Found it just a few more videos below here I stopped haha. “Clickbait is Unreasonably Effective” https://youtu.be/S2xHZPH5Sng

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                Yeah, that one I stopped hating clickbait so much after watching it, trying to become immune to it

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you look at the DeArrow website and browser extension pages, I made sure to only use high quality channels as examples (Tom Scott, CGP Grey) to demonstrate how far reaching the sensationalism problem is.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Tom Scott’s thumbnails aren’t that bad IMO, they’re pretty minimal in comparison to some other channels.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But they are so much worse than they were 6 months ago. He’s gone and ruined all of the old ones too with arrows and more deceptive titles.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        CGP Grey is personally painful to me. He used to be a no-nonsense education youtube legend, but in the last few years he’s just maximised clickability - even going thorugh his whole back catalogue and changing titles and thumbnails.

        For example, he made a great video about generative adversarial networks ~5 years ago but now its titled “How machines like ChatGPT learn” - despite coming out before GPT.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          Pretty much every successful YouTube channel edits titles. It’s just part of the algorithm game now. You will often see videos cycle through several different titles shortly after release.