@[email protected] to [email protected] • 6 months agoStarbucks accused of violating Americans with Disabilities Act by charging extra for non-dairywww.kiro7.commessage-square227fedilinkarrow-up1598
arrow-up1598external-linkStarbucks accused of violating Americans with Disabilities Act by charging extra for non-dairywww.kiro7.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 6 months agomessage-square227fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish17•6 months agoCould someone with lactose intolerance not merely omit the milk?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•6 months agoThat would be an actual reasonable accommodation in this case.
minus-squarestrawberrylinkfedilink5•6 months agoI mean that limits you to just straight black. no latte, cappuccino, nothing not against black coffee, but that’s not why people go to starbies
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•6 months agoI mean, this could apply very easily to a steakhouse too and vegetarians. Vegetarians would be limited to just salads and sides, but those aren’t why people go to a steakhouse.
Could someone with lactose intolerance not merely omit the milk?
That would be an actual reasonable accommodation in this case.
I mean that limits you to just straight black. no latte, cappuccino, nothing
not against black coffee, but that’s not why people go to starbies
I mean, this could apply very easily to a steakhouse too and vegetarians. Vegetarians would be limited to just salads and sides, but those aren’t why people go to a steakhouse.