• 001100 010010
    link
    fedilink
    English
    251 year ago

    Trains only run on a specified track and there isn’t one near me. A car isn’t bound by a track and can go anywhere.

    • Sylveon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      and there isn’t one near me.

      That’s exactly the problem that this community wants to fix.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        But that’s a certain level of naivete. I’ve lived in Europe and in the Western US, and for people who have lived in urban or suburban situations their whole lives, they simply can’t comprehend the vast tracts of land that exist in most of the US. Public transport isn’t viable when your nearest neighbor is at least five acres away.

        • Sylveon
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          Well yes, if you live in the middle of nowhere with literally no one else nearby, then public transport obviously doesn’t make sense. But that’s not where most people live.

          A large part of the population in the US doesn’t have access to public transport not because it wouldn’t be viable, but because car-centric infrastructure was built instead. And often better designed cities were bulldozed to make room for it.

          I was also going to recommend the Not Just Bikes video @[email protected] linked, definitely check it out!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            True, but a lot of US real estate, even in big cities, started out agricultural. Those underpinnings are still affecting them today, given that they are less than 300 years old. They just don’t have the history of being piled on top of each other that Europe has. The original American inhabitants didn’t have the infrastructure Europe has had since the Romans, even if their population HAD been so concentrated.

            The U.S population density is less than half that of Europe, even today.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Please. I have gone to Italy and seen far vaster landscapes in the mountainous areas than I’ve ever been cognizant of in the United States. And yes, I saw these locations from the window of a bus taking the highway system. The key thing is, people are not going to those far-out locations frequently. Actual transit problem-solving relates to the broad majority of the use cases people have, not about abstractly going to a pin thrown on a map.

          NJB summarizes why this argument is dumb better than I do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Trains could have intercity connections. Walk/bus to the train, ride the train, walk/bus to your destination.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        I have metro+train and it already wears me out so much that alI arrive at the office tired. I can’t imagine how I would survive through 3 different transit options twice a day

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          I do the same and if anything, it just helps me wake up or wind down after a long day. Out of pure curiosity, how does it wear you out?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t know, I could not even imagine the transit switch to be not overwhelming, it’s just way too many changes for me in a short span of time, like too many tasks. go down, wait for metro, try to not miss the stop, get up on escalator, go to platform, wait there, it’s just sucking out energy out of me, if I spent all that time just sitting on the train yes I unwind and I love it but dragging my laptop around and standing and waiting and having to concentrate instead of getting into the flow is disruptive for me. Plus I feel like underground is super dark and dirty and on the bus I get nauseous from so many braking and stopping and all the vibrating from the road

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              I’m sure you’re aware part of that anxiety can come from the unfamiliarity. I’m surprised it doesn’t end up being compared to the stress of merging from an on-ramp in a car, or watching crosswalks for pedestrians, or even just backing out of a driveway in some people’s cases.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                100% anxiety from unfamiliarity. My last job had me flying over the US (terrible but it was for a renewable energy company and I was part of the Ops team). The first trip, I missed my flight, on which was my overnight bag.

                But from that first flight, I knew exactly what to do, where to go, and when to do it.

                If people take time to learn these systems over time, then these fears go away. Just takes courage to learn something new

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -251 year ago

        Sure buddy, spend a few hours hopping public transport each day is so much fun.

        Cars are superior in every single way, it’s paupers that cry out of jealousy we’re seeing here.

        They know cars aren’t the problem, there are industries out there that spew out the equivalent of millions of cars but they don’t bitch about that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          hmmm, do I want to sit in a train, flip my laptop open and do some work, then walk through a park to the office for today… Or do I want to sit in traffic and do nothing…

          Tough choice there

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              9
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Work time starts when I open the laptop. I’m not volunteering that time, since i’m not completely insane. It makes a huge difference whether my workday starts in the office, or in the train.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            You’re right. It’s been raining all day today with a forecast of thunderstorms, I absolutely want to sit in a warm, dry box and not walk through the park :p

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            I’m gonna be real, I’d 100% rather sit in traffic. It’s somewhat relaxing to me.

            I hate this trend that we need to be working all the time, even during our commute.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              To each their own. I prefer 2 hours of working in the train and 6 in the office to traveling for 2 hours and working 8 hours in the office

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              To each their own. I prefer 2 hours of working in the train and 6 in the office to traveling for 2 hours and working 8 hours in the office

        • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          it’s paupers that cry out of jealousy we’re seeing here.

          Found Andrew Tate’s account

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Those industries don’t pump out their emissions in my city for me to breathe in, nor do they threaten to maim or kill me on a regular basis.

    • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      can go anywhere

      As long as there’s road, no serious traffic, and fuel stations along with rest stops.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11 year ago

      Thats not really true and you know it. Cars are like trains, limited mostly to paved roads that need to by built.

      • eltimablo
        link
        fedilink
        18
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Are you seriously trying to tell OP that he’s lying about not living near a train? Or are you trying to say that the part about them running on a fixed track isn’t true? Either way, this is a really dumb take.

        Also, you clearly haven’t been to rural areas, where dirt and gravel roads are common. Cars handle those just fine.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        But those roads are far more numerous and further reaching than train tracks. Trains go from a to b. Cars can go which ever route you want. And you don’t build train tracks around a house.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          Thats not true also. Rails have junctions that alow switching tracks and work like a normal road. The reason theres more roads is irelevante as it depends on investment. Some places invested more into roads and others did in rail. Check out old rail maps on the US