• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Please, point out specifically where my reading comprehension was lacking? Is asking for specific examples with quotes too much?

      Also still missing is the “trap” that I fell in to, and the “thing” that I blamed you for. Go ahead and quote those, otherwise I’ll take Hitchen’s Razor to those claims.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        Try the last several of your comments, I already said that so add that comment as well.

        I didn’t miss anything, it’s very obvious. Need I point out the color of the sky for you as well or at some point are you going to take responsibility for saying stupid trolly shit?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          Right, so at this point, you have made assertions without evidence, and when asked to simply reference the evidence, you have failed make even the simplest defense of your claims.

          Therefore, your points regarding my reading ability, blaming you for something, and that I fell into a “trap” by you can be refuted with the same evidentiary threshold.

          If you’d like to continue this discussion, please provide direct evidence that:

          • I have blamed you for something

          • I have fallen for a trap

          • there is a lack of reading comprehension on my part.

          Further discussion without meeting these (very basic) requirements is a tacit admission that any and all of those claims are without merit, and you yourself are trolling and not providing honest discourse.

          The ball is in your court.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            26 months ago

            My evidence is the definitions you’ve provided dumb dumb, that’s the trap.

            Again reading comprehension basil exposition, using more words doesn’t actually mean you’re saying anything of value.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              16 months ago

              This is a tacit admission from @madison420 that their previous statements are unfounded and meaningless.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                26 months ago

                There’s that reading comprehension thing again.

                It’s all there, just read the big words and use that smooth fuckin brain for something other then word vomit.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  16 months ago

                  There’s that reading comprehension thing again.

                  Another baseless accusation, adding further evidence that @Madison420 is not engaging in good-faith discussion, and tacitly acknowledges that their previous statements are meaningless, because they have been unable to point out any actual shortcomings in my reading comprehension.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    26 months ago

                    Amusing. Good luck on your lazy trolling endeavors. At least put in enough effort to keep up with the conversation.