• @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          93 months ago

          So you don’t ridiculise your country by promoting freedom of trade but seizing the assets of the countries you don’t like when it’s a better tech than yours.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              our most and least popular politician is a sex predator who earned all his money by his dad dying and is currently at risk of losing his money because he can’t stop lying about things.

              The greatest monument to american shamelessness is Donald J Trump.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            23 months ago

            I’m not with my government on a lot of things they do. I want the same data rights and restrictions to apply to all companies that host people’s personal information.

            But what’s this about Impressive tech? Tiktoc? First that’s laughable, even more laughable is how you phrase is as if anyone would give a fuck if another country had some better tech. Sounds like you are projecting your own insecurities.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          53 months ago

          It will be just as easy for them, just less profitable. Now they’ll just pay Zuckerberg or Musk for the information. If they aren’t already.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        73 months ago

        And it’s not like they can’t maintain use of the thing while not being owners. Come on. Like there’s some magic rule if a company’s not owned by China, it can’t be used as a Chinese intelligence source? Come on.

        If social media is in cahoots with foreign intelligence, there are better ways to handle it in my opinion.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          83 months ago

          The fact that China is using disinformation to stop the forced sale of TikTok is pretty telling that they will be negatively impacted by this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        63 months ago

        Yeah, you are right. They should do like they do in China, sell to a JV with a local company at fire sales price… Oh wait

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          sell to a JV with a local company at fire sales price

          The Chinese policy is to share ownership with locals, so that a firm isn’t simply extracting wealth from the Chinese market.

          The American policy is to seize a pre-existing firm after it has developed, by accusing its Singapore founder of being a secret Chinese Communist.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      163 months ago

      This is primarily intended as a hostile buyout of tiktok. It has literally nothing to do with China.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Lmao, the USA doesn’t operate the commercial sector outside of power, trains, rockets, and planes. It won’t benefit from the sale in any way other than lowering Chinese involvement.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          73 months ago

          The US government works for the billionaires that run the economy. Many billionaires want to buy tiktok. In fact, there’s already teams of people set up for buying out tiktok. The government is just the tool for the hostile acquisition. No one said the US government is directly purchasing tiktok.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            23 months ago

            The US Government and Billionaires are opposing forces, one political party wants to tax billionaires while the other is on the payroll.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              43 months ago

              They’re not at all opposing forces. Some billionaires are in competition with each other and political parties are tools at certain billionaires disposal.

              The act of taxing income is but one political mechanism used to influence the power of some billionaires over another.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  23 months ago

                  I’m not sure I understand your question. They are both pro-government. If any one human could be the personification of government, it would be the President of the United States.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    13 months ago

                    So every billionaire is pro-government, and against taxation, but also pro-taxation to hurt the other billionaires (each other) but also the political party with a platform of “Tax the Rich” is in no way actually opposed to the political party who literally cuts taxes for the rich?

                    You should see a doctor.