• Ech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    438 months ago

    This was intended to be a general statement on IP law rather than law enforcement.

    This is exactly the kind of shit IP law should be used for. It’s one thing when Disney goes after murals at kindergartens. It’s another thing entirely when something like a police force publicly associates your IP with their actions.

    • Pennomi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      I feel like it shouldn’t be IP law that stops this, but rather human rights laws. Those aren’t robust enough in the United States yet. Obviously the company will use what tools are available to them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        This isn’t a human rights violation, however. Lego is not a person.

        But, Lego heads are their intellectual property, so they can stop that. The human rights part would be more of an issue for another organisation.

        • Pennomi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          58 months ago

          That’s what I’m saying, the human rights part is the only thing that matters in this issue. IP law is ultimately meaningless and a hinderance to society while privacy and human rights are a moral objection to what’s happening here.

          What LEGO did does not fix the problem, prisoners will still be used as social media posts. They do not fundamentally care about those people, they just want to protect their brand.

        • @iknowitwheniseeit
          link
          English
          18 months ago

          Not the human rights of Lego, rather the human rights of suspects or accused people.