dantheclamman to [email protected]English • 6 months agoVinyl records outsell CDs for the second year runningwww.theverge.commessage-square333fedilinkarrow-up1704
arrow-up1704external-linkVinyl records outsell CDs for the second year runningwww.theverge.comdantheclamman to [email protected]English • 6 months agomessage-square333fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•edit-26 months agoMost CDs pressed after the mid-90’s are audiological garbage not worth paying for. If the waveform looks like this, I ain’t buying it:
minus-squareMrScottyTaylinkfedilinkEnglish8•6 months agoThey usually have a higher bitrate than you can get from streaming. There’s not one CD I have that I immediately tell the difference in quality of I switch between streaming (or even a standard mp3 actually) and a CD. CD wins every time.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•6 months agoSo you have a crap master. Compare the same master between compact disc and vinyl when making your judgments.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoalot of people dont work with audio, but i actually have, you may be downvoted, but you are correct.
Most CDs pressed after the mid-90’s are audiological garbage not worth paying for.
If the waveform looks like this, I ain’t buying it:
They usually have a higher bitrate than you can get from streaming. There’s not one CD I have that I immediately tell the difference in quality of I switch between streaming (or even a standard mp3 actually) and a CD. CD wins every time.
So you have a crap master. Compare the same master between compact disc and vinyl when making your judgments.
alot of people dont work with audio, but i actually have, you may be downvoted, but you are correct.