FenrirIII to Political [email protected] • 8 months agoPlease, for the love of God, VOTE!pawb.socialmessage-square696fedilinkarrow-up11.03K
arrow-up11.03KimagePlease, for the love of God, VOTE!pawb.socialFenrirIII to Political [email protected] • 8 months agomessage-square696fedilink
minus-squareJaysynlinkfedilink8•8 months agoLOL, if you could prove Duvinger’s Law wrong you’d be famous, but you’re not. You’re very likely a Trump supporter stirring shit with those facile arguments.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-28 months agoYou know what this sort of rhetorical technique they’re using reminds me of? Sovereign citizens lmao.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•8 months ago You’re very likely a Trump supporter stirring shit with those facile arguments. baby, i’m an anarchist.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•8 months ago LOL, if you could prove Duvinger’s Law wrong you’d be famous, but you’re not. duverger’s “law” has no predictive value at all. it’s post-hoc storytelling. you can’t prove it wrong because it’s a useless tautology.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•8 months agononfalsifiability is actually a bad feature in theories.
LOL, if you could prove Duvinger’s Law wrong you’d be famous, but you’re not.
You’re very likely a Trump supporter stirring shit with those facile arguments.
You know what this sort of rhetorical technique they’re using reminds me of? Sovereign citizens lmao.
baby, i’m an anarchist.
duverger’s “law” has no predictive value at all. it’s post-hoc storytelling. you can’t prove it wrong because it’s a useless tautology.
nonfalsifiability is actually a bad feature in theories.