• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    519 months ago

    Almost… Another way to see it is they burdened future generations as an expedient measure to save the lives of the people now in the past. Another another way to look at the bomb is preventing another world war.

    An interesting historical point is Japan had largely been defeated by the time the bombs were dropped. And they had the option to bomb an uninhabited (or very lightly) part of Japan’s territory as a show of force. But, instead they specifically chose to irradiate civilians.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        129 months ago

        Because future generations have to safehold and not misuse extremely destructive knowledge. We have a world where North Korea has nuclear weapons, but do they have the ethics to use them responsibly, understanding their full potential? Do the other countries with nuclear bombs have that ethical responsibility, especially over generations? Cuz that big red button is going to be around for a while.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39 months ago

          One would argue given enough time some kind of civilizations ending event is an inevitability. With nukes we’re just increasing that risk.

          • Cosmic Cleric
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            I always like to think of it more as a race between evolution and extinction.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        89 months ago

        Yes, I would say the threat of dying in nuclear hell fire (if you were lucky) a bit of a burden.