• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      298 months ago

      When you’re an enterprise client paying serious money for the service, there are often data protection requirements. They have the capability to support things like export controlled information or HIPAA compliance in office, and appropriate legal agreements ensuring data protection. It’s the power of collective bargaining (they are buying 100s++ licenses instead of just one).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        108 months ago

        Exactly. If it’s a regulated industry, they’re not just paying for Teams. They’re paying for someone else to worry about meeting certain compliance requirements and take the heat if things go wrong. I’m not sure how many companies besides Microsoft can offer that. At most it’s a fraction of the available options.

      • @person420
        link
        English
        28 months ago

        It’s probably more than 100s. One of my Slack orgs has over 300 paid users and Slack barely considers us midsize.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Facebook is usually not used by businesses which expect it to be in compliance with compex healthcare regulations, the law is spelled HIPAA, and that article is about the UK, which doesn’t have that law.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      148 months ago

      You’ve clearly not worked in enterprise recently. Everything is about the Cloud, AI, and reducing Opex spending currently.

    • chameleon
      link
      fedilink
      78 months ago

      They already did before this. MS-hosted Office 365 is running the vast majority of worldwide corporate email and hosts a significant amount of corporate files on business OneDrive/SharePoint. I’ll never understand why companies bought into ‘the cloud’ so easily.

      • Alto
        link
        fedilink
        78 months ago

        For most these things, it is far cheaper to simply use some sort of SaaS than to actually set things up in house. There’s probably plenty of times where it’d in theory be cheaper in the long term, but most businesses are going to see the short term savings as extra capital to try to expand.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        68 months ago

        In my size of company, it’s simple. I simply don’t want the overhead of running an email system. It’s not just running a server, it’s running a server farm for HA, dealing with domain blacklisting, retention systems, storage and firewalling to name a few.