@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 8 months agoShould it just be called JASM?programming.devmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1188file-text
arrow-up1188imageShould it just be called JASM?programming.dev@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 8 months agomessage-square20fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink33•edit-28 months agoActual assembly in mainstream use: x86 arm risc v mainstream byte code: jvm .net (I think) wasm fake assembly people may write: llvm wasm wat (web assembly text) is actually written is S-expressions, like lisp but without code as data. Edit: formatting
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•8 months agoThe runtime is even called “common language runtime” (clr), as it is intended to support many different languages, which the jvm never was.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•8 months agoLanguages like F# or (God forbid) VB.NET
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink12•8 months agoI’m making my own, because all mainstream options are bloated for my usecase…
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•8 months agoLook no further https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-instruction_set_computer
Do we have 3 assemblies now?
Actual assembly in mainstream use:
x86
arm
risc v
mainstream byte code:
jvm
.net (I think)
wasm
fake assembly people may write:
llvm
wasm
wat (web assembly text) is actually written is S-expressions, like lisp but without code as data.
Edit: formatting
.NET thing is called
ILThe runtime is even called “common language runtime” (clr), as it is intended to support many different languages, which the jvm never was.
Languages like F# or (God forbid) VB.NET
I’m making my own, because all mainstream options are bloated for my usecase…
How many do you want?
One. To rule them all.
Look no further https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-instruction_set_computer
deleted by creator
You forgot CC :)